Wednesday, July 29, 2015
Losing Money At Zero Percent
One thing that can drive students crazy when first learning Finance is
that sometimes things seem counterintuitive. For example, a recent article
highlights that while a zero percent interest rate on car loans seems
like a good deal, it can actually cost the uninformed buyer money. One
specific example is the 2015 Jeep Cherokee SUV. The vehicle lists for
$27,153, but the buyer can take a $2,000 rebate or zero percent
financing for 60 months. While many people would jump at the zero
percent financing, the monthly payment under this option would be
$452.55. If the buyer takes the rebate instead and finances the vehicle
at 2 percent, the monthly payments would only be $440.88 per month.
Although the article does not discuss a breakeven interest rate, we hope
your time value of money skills allow you to calculate that the
breakeven rate is 3.10 percent. So, if you can borrow at any rate below
3.10 percent for 60 months, the $2,000 rebate is preferable to zero
percent financing!
Tuesday, July 28, 2015
The Chinese Stock Market Rout
Any market can experience a bear market and the Shanghai Composite, the
144 China-based companies that have a primary listing on major U.S.
stock markets, is no exception. The Shanghai Composite lost about 8.5
percent on Monday and is down about 27 percent since its June 12 peak.
The result is a loss of about $40 billion
in stock value! Another measure of Chinese stock performance, the
CSI300, which comprises the largest listed companies in Shanghai and
Shenzhen, fell 8.8 percent Monday. As a result, the Chines government
has said that it was ready to buy shares of stock
to stabilize the market and stop the "systematic risk." Regulators also
said that they would harshly punish anyone who was malicously shorting stocks.
Saturday, July 25, 2015
Really Bad Financial Analysis
There are times when we get a headache from slapping our foreheads after
reading really bad financial analysis, especially when done by a
well-respected S&P 500 company like Boeing. But, after reading this recent article,
it may be a headache that lasts for a while. As you can read, the
article states that Boeing loses $23 million on each 787 it sells. And
while we understand Microsoft loses money on every XBox One, it makes up for those
losses on the sale of each video game. So, we were wondering how Boeing
was making up the losses on the sale of each 787 until we read this:
"Commercial jetliner programs typically lose money in the early years of production until the heavy upfront investments in engineering and production are repaid. Boeing's accounting spreads those costs over a large block of planes the company expects to deliver."
In other words, Boeing is losing money only because they are spreading the initial cost of the project over the life of the project! Accounting for the initial cost of a project in this manner not only violates a basic tenet of capital budgeting, but gives a misleading profitability number to investors.
"Commercial jetliner programs typically lose money in the early years of production until the heavy upfront investments in engineering and production are repaid. Boeing's accounting spreads those costs over a large block of planes the company expects to deliver."
In other words, Boeing is losing money only because they are spreading the initial cost of the project over the life of the project! Accounting for the initial cost of a project in this manner not only violates a basic tenet of capital budgeting, but gives a misleading profitability number to investors.
If You Don't Like It, Create Your Own
Russian authorities are upset that Standard & Poor's and Moody's,
who cited falling oil prices, a recession, and international sanctions
due to the conflict in the Ukraine, rated the country's debt as junk. With the mindset "We can do it ourselves and everyone will believe", Russia announced that is starting its own credit rating agency. We are sure that Russian sovereign debt will be AAA rated.
Wednesday, July 22, 2015
Apple's Cash Hoard Grows
Apple's cash balance, which has been enormous by any measure, topped $200 billion
for the first time. Cash held internationally has reached 89 percent,
or about $180 billion, of Apple's cash. Apple has been reluctant to
repatriate the money back to the U.S. as it would be forced to pay the
full 35 percent corporate tax rate on the repatriated money. In an
effort to pay investors, Apple has issued $50 billion in debt in various
currencies around the world.
Tuesday, July 21, 2015
A $120 Million Bogey?
So what affects stock prices? In reality, pretty much everything,
possibly even a bogey at the famed Road Hole at St. Andrews in Scotland.
For the non-golfers, phenom Jordan Spieth made a bogey (one over par)
on the 17th hole in the final round of The Open Championship on Monday,
which virtually eliminated him from contention. Shortly after he made
the bogey, stock in Under Armour, the company Spieth has a marketing
deal with, fell from $89.47 to $88.79.
While this is a relatively small dip, it reduced the market value of
the company by $120 million. All in all, a pretty expensive round of
golf.
Monday, July 20, 2015
An Overconfident Donald
One of the biases often discussed in behavioral finance is
overconfidence, that is the belief your abilities are better than they are.
Further, many people actually have overconfidence in individuals who tell
everyone how good they are. Take Donald Trump. Although his wealth is estimated
by Forbes at $4.1 billion, he
recently stated that he was worth $10 billion as a self-made man (who started
with his father’s millions.) And while his companies have filed bankruptcy four
times, The Donald will tell you how good of an investor he is. Unfortunately, a recent article disputes this statement. If The Donald had taken his stated
wealth of $500 million in 1982 and invested in the S&P 500, he would now
have $20 billion, twice his stated worth. We hope you note a couple of important
points. First, as we discuss in the textbook, the power of compounding greatly increases
the value of a portfolio over time. Second, don’t always believe the hype of
self-styled investment gurus.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)